StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

I.T Doesn't Matter by Nicholas G.Carr - Article Example

Cite this document
Summary
This article provides a critique of the article “IT doesn’t matter” by Nicholas G.Carr published in the May 2003 edition of the Harvard Business Review. It briefly retells the article and describes readers’ feedback to it. It concludes that the specific wording and title of the article led to agues and misunderstanding regarding the issues of IT industry…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.4% of users find it useful
I.T Doesnt Matter by Nicholas G.Carr
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "I.T Doesn't Matter by Nicholas G.Carr"

Running head: A critical review of IT does not matter A Critical Review of ‘IT does not matter’ In APA Style Your Roll/Section Your Department’s Name Your Institution’s Name Date: The article ‘IT does not matter’ by Nicholas G.Carr, published in the May 2003 edition of the Harvard Business Review, is voted the best article appear in the magazine during 2003 by the staff of HBR. Nicholas G. Carr is an American writer who has published books and articles on technology, business and culture. He has argued in the article that the strategic importance of Information Technology in business has diminished as IT has become more common place, standardized and cheaper. After reviewing the article, one can easily realize that the evolution of information Technology in Business is similar to that of earlier technologies like railroads and electric power. With the advancement of IT, the door of global opportunities has been opened to the challenging companies for utilizing their competitive advantages to reach world wide. These technologies have become the commodity inputs although they are invisible. Firstly, IT is a standardized transport vehicle of information. Secondly, its prices are subject to sharp deflation as its cost decreases with increasing of their availability. Thirdly, it is highly replicable not only for software (reusable objects) but also in terms of business process. Fourthly, IT also becomes transparent to its users. Finally, it becomes ubiquitous. IT would proceed for many years to lift the productivity of entire industries. But from the strategic point of view, it is no longer matter to the competitive fortunes of the individual companies. IT provides its greatest benefits when it becomes a shared and standardized infrastructure of the companies. So IT would be the infrastructural technology instead of proprietary technology. Proprietary technologies are owned by a single company; in contrast, infrastructural technologies are broadly shared by the companies. According to the review, it is said that infrastructural technologies have far more value than proprietary technologies. For the macro economy, the value produced by the proprietary technologies for the development of individual companies would be trivial in comparison with the value produced by the infrastructural technologies that would be ordinal and become part of the global business infrastructure. The writer also says that infrastructural technologies also begin to fade in to the background of the business because it becomes an ordinary phenomenon of global business. The goal of this writing is to promote a better understanding to the business & technology managers, as well as, investors and policy makers how technology, competition and profits intersect. The writer says that although more than fifty years have been passed since the use of computers in business, still we don’t know clearly about their influence on Commerce in general and corporate performance in particular. He quoted, “At a broad level we can’t yet say precisely why computerization had little effect on industrial productivity for four decades, and then in the mid-1990s suddenly seemed to become the driving force behind the sharp acceleration in U.S. productivity. Nor can we say with certainty why the recent productivity gains have been so unevenly distributed, appearing in certain industries and regions that have invested heavily in information technology but not in others that have also spent great sums on computer hardware and software.” It is a matter of great debate in this 21st century of Information Technology although the writer concludes the issue saying that IT does not matter. To support his dialogue it is very explicit that Information Technology is the technology both hardware and software, only used to store, process, and transport information in digital form. But IT does not encompass the information created by the talents of human beings. IT acts as a tool designed for managing information created by people. IT is invented by human talents, and it is used for them. So the most credit worthy element is the human talent to produce information, invent IT and use it in the proper ways. It is clear in the article that the writer only talks about the term ‘Information technology’ itself to support his dialogue ‘IT does not matter’, not the term ‘The use of IT does not matter.’ It is certainly obvious to all of us that the transformation of IT from a set of proprietary and a heterogeneous system in to a shared and standardized infrastructure has become a great infrastructure for economic and social benefits. On the other way it is also true that with the maturity of IT technology, it became cheaper, more accessible and the competitors are able to copy instantly any valuable information or innovation. In the past, information systems and networks formed very strong barriers to competition, but those barriers have fallen with the revolution of IT. The IT infrastructure makes specialization and outsourcing easier but it does not mean that companies will hurry to pursue them leaving their other valuable basic works in different areas. The writer says that the companies should balance the need to share information and process in the global competitive market. The author focuses on the practical managerial implications of commoditization of IT controlling cost and risk that will help both business and technology managers make appropriate decisions in the years ahead. The writer also describes how our natural enthusiasm for a new technology leads us to exaggerate its benefits overlooking its costs. He says, ‘I examine how this bias has influenced our perceptions of the so-called computer revolution.’ The author mentions the three policies to remember for shaping the future. First, the company should reevaluate their IT investment and management. Second, the vendors should re-shape their competitive strategies as the technology industry is restructuring. Third, policy maker and economist should assess the overall effect of computers on industrial performance and productivity, which will lead to the development of IT infrastructure throughout the world. So we are in the turning point of making the right choice in exchanging information and using IT. After being published, the article “IT does not matter” has raised a critical debate among the suppliers and users of Information Technology. It has been widely and passionately discussed, dissected, questioned, critiqued, attacked and also defended. Many business professors, executives and journalists pointed out the strengths and weakness of this dialogue. The writer says himself, “For me personally, the debate has been at once gratifying, and frustrating.” It is gratifying or rewarding because the evolution of Information Technology was the most important and constructive business phenomenon behind the giant successful companies in the world for creating a bridge globally by the charisma of IT. No one can refuse the importance of IT for executing their business for accessing in to the global market. Evolution of IT has saved a great deal of time needed by the human efforts. Now information becomes the key of democracy, nothing left to hide to educate man world wide to present this earth the larger numbers of creative human beings by saving their time, educating them and promoting their knowledge by using IT effectively and efficiently. It’s the latest era of Information Technology. So it is not the property of any individual groups; it must be the asset of whole mankind for utilizing its fullest potential. So of course IT is a matter. It is like a latest vaccine to me to keep the business healthy and smooth. So a company must realize the dose of a vaccine on the right time and by the right way. Without the use of IT, human talents can not flow and be connected widely that is essential for win-win situation to have a global village of business. IT is the latest infrastructure to face global competitions. Now one can’t stay in the dark corner with his or her talents only; his or her talents must be focused and utilized successfully by the global infrastructure which is the result of evolution of IT. How can we say that IT does not matter? In contrast the debate is also frustrating to the writer. He comments, “It has been frustrating because at least a few of the criticisms of my article reflect misinterpretations of it- misinterpretations traceable in some cases because of my own lack of clarity in defining the terms and scope of my argument.” IT’S transformation from a set of proprietary and heterogeneous systems in to a shared and standardized infrastructure is a common resource that will deliver its greatest social and economic social benefits. So it does not matter now-a- days of Democracy of Information rightfully and legally. IT is the common phenomenon for companies in the question of its availability and cost. It is open to all and not a matter of competitive advantage any more. So for the success of business IT is not a matter, the matter is the utilization of IT by the right way and right choice that will be cost effective, more dynamic, time saving and above all user friendly. It is the human effort that is the matter for producing information and communicating globally. A company makes contracts with another company by executing the strong communication for promoting their products or services in the right ways to the potential markets that can’t be done merely by copying the information of another company. It is a serious effort to run the business using own expertise. We could find many Bill Gates if Bill gates is born every time with the usage of IT. So Bill gates does not born frequently with the advancement of IT. It is the talents of Bill Gates to invent it. One can build a good business website by copying information, but to be successful in the business, a business personnel mast have the unique criteria that can’t be copied or purchased by any mean. So the writer simply points out the overall matter and tells us that IT does not matter in the simple sense. IT can’t be the substitute of human talent for the success of business. The core of success is the human talents that invented technologies for them and by them. Technologies didn’t create human talents. But I suggest to use more specific wording and title to avoid misunderstanding regarding this issue in this present world of complexity where simple matters may be complicated, argued and questioned. So I think from my own personal view that the dialogue “IT does not matter” might be less argued if it would be “Accessibility of IT does not matter”. Sources: 1.Carr, Nicholas (2004). Does IT matter? http://books.google.com/ 2. Yann, Gourvennec (2003). A summary of Carrs "IT doesn’t matter" article. http://visionarymarketing.com/ 3. Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia (2008).Nicholas G. Carr http://en.wikipedia.org/ 4. Carr, Nicholas (2004). Does IT matter? Reviews and Responses. http://www.nicholasgcarr.com/ Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Critique of Article I.T Doesn't Matter by Nicholas G.Carr Essay, n.d.)
Critique of Article I.T Doesn't Matter by Nicholas G.Carr Essay. https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1549753-it-doesnt-matter
(Critique of Article I.T Doesn'T Matter by Nicholas G.Carr Essay)
Critique of Article I.T Doesn'T Matter by Nicholas G.Carr Essay. https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1549753-it-doesnt-matter.
“Critique of Article I.T Doesn'T Matter by Nicholas G.Carr Essay”. https://studentshare.org/journalism-communication/1549753-it-doesnt-matter.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF I.T Doesn't Matter by Nicholas G.Carr

Negative effects brought by technology

hellip; Sometimes we ran out of patient if it takes more than a few minutes to download information we are in need of from the internet (carr, 2008).... The notion that human being will create something that cannot control, which will lead to humanity downfall, is a worrying real possibility in this era of increased innovations(carr, 2008).... Nicholas Curr said “A few Google searches, some quick clicks on hyperlinks, and I've got the telltale fact or pithy quote I was after” (carr, 2008)....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Does Information Technology Matter

Institutions and corporations are transforming their book keeping and production from the earlier manual systems to the more sophisticated and efficient information… Questions has been raised on the significance of information technology but considering its definition which changes the meaning of time, it would be true to say that more can be achieved through IT than without it (Reynolds 2009 p 27)....
13 Pages (3250 words) Essay

Information Technology and Sustained Competitive Advantage

On one hand his argument could be justified due to the readily available access to Does “IT” Matter Does “IT” Matter Do you agree with the argument made by nicholas Carr to support hisposition that IT no longer gives companies a competitive advantage?... The argument presented by nicholas Carr (2003) is thought provoking and debatable.... He vacillated in his conviction that IT doesn't matter and… his assertion of the immediate accessibility and the duplication of IT processes preventing companies from distinguishing themselves and creating an advantage were unclear and lacked fervor....
1 Pages (250 words) Assignment

Case Study on IT Doesn't Matter

The literature is increasingly replete with references to IT investments not as strategic investments but as necessary investments whose risks need to be managed, and this pieces of literature, for one, show the wisdom of the insights provided by carr.... The same can be said of literature investigating the impact of IT investments on firm valuation or market value, which is to say, that the general lack of impact on firm valuation due to its investments in IT further corroborate what carr is saying about IT investments being necessary but not necessarily equivalent to improving the future prospects of the firm relative to competitors and the general market (carr; Dos Santos et al....
1 Pages (250 words) Case Study

Information System

Nevertheless, Nicholas carr asserts that IT does not matter because profitability of a company is not based on the amount invested in IT.... His assertions that IT does not matter also imply that information technology has degenerated in its importance as the power and ambiguity associated with IT increases (carr, 2003).... The perception of carr contradicts that of Gartner since the latter considers IT to be useful for business growth and development (Hunter, Lopez, & Scheibenreif, 2012)....
2 Pages (500 words) Coursework

Is technology and obsession with youth ruling our lives

Super Sad True Love Story by author Gary Steinhart tells the story of Lenny Abramov, a thirty-nine years old man who falls in love with young Eunice Park.... The story is told around Lenny's diaries and Eunice's posts on hers Global Teen's account.... … A common phenomenon in today's world is older employees being substitute for younger ones, almost all the time with the excuse that they are not fitted for the company anymore....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

A Tool that Should be used Carefully

nbsp; Though IT is an integral part of the decision making process, certain issues arise reporting mixed findings pertaining to the relationship between IT investments and firms profitability as mentioned in the much-touted controversial article by nicholas g.... This paper attempts to make a presentation agreeing with the assumption of nicholas g.... Carr in “IT doesn't matter”.... Carr made in his article that the IT really doesn't matter and that companies should spend less on IT and utilize only those IT solutions which would boost the company's profit rather than exceed it....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Does IT Really Matter Anymore

Nicholas Carr says no in his controversial article, IT doesn't matter.... Does IT really matter anymore?... In part one of his articles; he opposes the widely accepted opinion that incorporation of IT into business operations gives firms an edge over the others in the highly competitive world....
6 Pages (1500 words) Book Report/Review
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us