StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
This essay "Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation" discusses the aftermath of the Second World War. The US and allied occupation of Japan has been described in the literature as bringing about more change in that country than any other time since the Meiji Period.  …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER93.5% of users find it useful
Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation"

Why Did Japan Change so Much During the US Occupation? Introduction During the US occupation of Japan, Japan experienced what has been described as “dramatic, even traumatic, social change?” (Molasky 1999, 4). In the aftermath of the Second World War, the US and allied occupation of Japan has been described in the literature as bringing about more change in that country than any other time since the Meiji Period. Historians and political scientist generally agree that it was a combination of a number of factors underlying the reasons Japan’s social, political and economic changed so dramatically during the US occupation in the immediate aftermath of the Second World War. The underlying factors include the fact that it was Japan’s first military occupation by foreigners (Takemae and Riketts xxvi). Additionally the devastation suffered during the Second World War which left Japan vulnerable so that cooperation with the foreigners was not a problem, the approach taken by the US to restructuring Japan’s post-war constitution and military (Dower 199, 24). The US occupation of Japan provided a unique opportunity for the US to influence political and social change in country that was weakened “both psycho logically and physically” (Scalapino 1976, 104). Both of these traits, Japan’s defeat and the US opportunity to influence political and social change, would provide the basic and underlying reasons for why the US occupation of Japan would bring about so much change during the former’s occupation. To begin with when US troops occupied Japan in August 1945, the country was in ruins particularly in Nagasaki and Hiroshima. Japanese leaders were in a state of shock and the population fearful of what the “victors” might put them through (Schonberger 1989, 1). The Supreme Commander of the Allied Powers, General MacArthur was prepared to reconstruct what was characterized as “an ancient and highly sophisticated society” with a population of eighty million people (Schonberger 1989, 1). A political and socio-economic thought in Japan preceding the Second World War would operate in conjunction with the post-war devastation that the US met upon occupying Japan. Japan’s modern state which evolved during the Meiji era from 1868 was a “state political project” aimed at the modernization and Westernization of Japan (Shibata 2005, 2). On another level, the War itself resulted in a climate between the US and the Japan where each side demonized the other. For the Japanese, the US represented “white supremacy” and were put together with the British perceived as “demonic and beastly” Anglo-Saxons” (Koshiro 1999, 1). For the US, the Japanese were “inferior imitators of the white races” (Koshiro 1999, 1). It was therefore surprising that once the war ended, both sides were able to cooperate in the reconstruction of Japan. With the signing of the San Francisco Peace Treaty, Japan emerged as a demilitarized independent country (Koshiro 1999, 1-2). For a long time prior to the Second World War, Japan’s political and social system was built around pride in nationalism and the continuity of sovereignty. The US occupation which was focused on liberalized democratic systems would focus on processes that sharply clashed with Japan’s system. The US was not merely satisfied to change Japan’s political system, it also wanted to change its society. As Crompton (2000) writes: America’s reformers wanted more than procedural democracy; they wanted to change Japanese society at all levels. New political institutions, a pro-democratic political culture, and a more individualistic belief system required the dismantling of traditional symbols (121). The depth of the changes in Japan during the US occupation is entirely representative of the goals enunciated above and the fact that the US was largely successful in bringing about those changes. What makes these changes so unique is the fact that they took place amongst in an atmosphere where the vanquished was led by the victors and the changes were alien to the preexisting political and social structure which had been firmly established. A war weary Japan was both suspicious of and receptive when the US commenced its occupation in 1945. It is therefore hardly surprising that the Japanese and the US would cooperate and it was this cooperation that facilitated so much political and social change in the short time during the US occupation from 1945 to 1952. The most dramatic change was the implementation of the US-drafted constitution in 1947 which was different from the pre-existing Meiji constitution and perceived as an import from “an alien political culture” (McCargo 2000, 27). The 1947 constitution depowered the Emperor reducing it to no more than a figure head. Japan’s sovereignty was vested in its people who would elect their own parliament and the Cabinet was accountable to the Japanese populace. Women’s suffrage was introduced and “local autonomy” was implemented as the core principle of governance (McCargo 2000, 27). The independence of the judiciary was introduced and human rights would be protected (McCargo 2000, 27). These kinds of changes would be entirely dramatic considering the pre-existing bureaucratic government structure which vested the administrative powers in the hereditary class (Ishida 1989, 8). Change however, was largely successful because they received popular support from the Japanese citizens. The US’s goals and the means for achieving them provided some form of reconciliation which closed the gap between the population and the government and served to satisfy the current regime. It is the approach and the willingness of the Japanese elite and the ordinary citizen to accept these changes that accounts for so much change during the US occupation of Japan. During its seven year occupation of Japan, the US would employ a “massive campaign of reform” which was calculated to abrogate militarism as well as the feudal powers with the intent that Japan could not pose a threat to international peace again (Best 2008, 336). At the same time, the US permitted the government to remain in place as well as the emperor. The US rationale was for Japan to eventually make the full democratic transition so that elites would not feel as though it had been forced upon them and then revert to former political structure once the US left Japan (Best 2008, 336). In other words, there was so much change in Japan during the US occupation because the US approach to its occupation was designed to penetrate the entire social foundation of Japan and to introduce changes that would be accepted and perpetuated. This required working with the Japanese and making concessions that would engender enthusiasm for the reconstruction of Japan. Moreover, any preexisting hostilities between the US and Japan during the occupation was tempered by the US’s developing containment policies against the spread of Soviet Communism. The US feared that a weak and hostile Japan would leave it vulnerable to assistance from China and the Soviet Union and it was best if the US implemented changes that would ensure that Japan evolved into a formidable Asian ally (Miyasato 1992, Ch. 7). This meant that the US would necessarily have to ensure that the reconstruction of Japan not only liberalized it, but strengthened it. To this end, the US could not rest its hopes merely on liberal democratic reforms, but had to ensure that economic reforms were conducive to sustaining the social and political changes. Regardless of the Cold War incentives, the mere focus on economic reform would also explain why Japan underwent so many changes during the US occupation. The fact is, the changes were not merely political in nature but also economic and both sources of change struck at the heart of Japan, making it a successful sovereign nation and a formidable US ally in the Asian Pacific. So while the US occupation of Japan focused on liberal democratic reforms from 1945-1947, the second phase of reconstruction during the US occupation turned to economic reform. This economic reform was aimed at “economic recovery and eventual rearmament” (Best 2008, 336). Best (2008) explains that: The transformation in occupation policy was caused by a number of concerns, such as the need to re-establish Japan as a key player in the world economy, and the fear that continued economic dislocation would encourage the growth of communism (337-338). In restructuring and building Japan’s economy, the US implemented a policy in 1949 which was aimed at reducing the government’s expenditure, reducing inflation and encouraging growth in exports. The export growth was cultivated by providing Japan with “preferential access to raw materials and foreign currency earnings” (Best 2008, 337). Ultimately the transformation of Japan was so mammoth because it was consistent with the political ambitions of both the US and Japan. Both sides were willing to make the necessary changes to accomplish their respective political goals. As previously noted the US wanted Japan to be a strong economic and democratic ally, safe from the grasp of Communism. Japan’s pre-War political mentality shaped a policy to become a power that rivaled the strongest of Western powers. However, having been devastated by the war, Japan was happy enough to find its way back from the spoils of war. With the US’s help it could regain sovereignty and independence and it could become an ally to the West rather than a rival. In the aftermath of the war, there was little or no prospect of Japan regaining and cultivating national pride as a world power. The US restored that hope and Japan was only too willing to recover and to regain its stature. The success of the US occupation in the context of the changes brought about in Japan is described by Schonberger (1989) as follows: The government of Japan was conservative and staunchly anti-communist. The working class, for the time, was effectively stilled…the Japanese as a whole appeared to look favorably upon the United States. Above all, the peace and security treaties and the US-Japan economic cooperation agreements had transformed Japan into America’s key military and economic ally in Asia which no other power in the region could challenge (279). None of these changes would have occurred had the US and Japan approached the occupation with the hostilities that guided their decisions and judgment during the War. The fact that they both had similar goals, albeit driven by different incentives and were able to cooperate largely accounts for why Japan experienced so much change during the US occupation. Bibliography Best, A. (2000) International History of the Twentieth Century and Beyond. Routledge. Crompton, R. (2000) East Asian Democratization: Impact of Globalization, Culture and Economy. Greenwood Publishing Group. Dower, J. (1999) Embracing Defeat: Japan in the Wake of World War II. W.W. Norton and Company. Ellington, L (2002) Japan: A Global Studies Handbook. ABC-CLIO. Ishida, T. (1989) Japanese Political Culture: Change and Continuity. Transaction Books. McCargo, D. (2000) Contemporary Japan. Palgrave MacMillan. Miyasato, S. (1992) “John Foster Dulles and the Peace Settlement with Japan.” Cited in Immerman, R. (ed) John Foster Dulles and the Diplomacy of the Cold War. Princeton University Press. Molasky, M. (1999) The American Occupation of Japan and Okinawa: Literature and Memory. Routledge. Scalapino, R. (1976) “The American Occupation of Japan – Perspectives after Three Decades.” The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science Vol. 428 (1): 104-113. Schonberger, H. (1989) Aftermath of War: Americans and the Remaking of Japan, 1945-1952. Kent State University Press. Shibata, M. (2005) Japan and Germany under the U.S. Occupation. Lexington Books. Takemae, E. and Ricketts, R. (2003) The Allied Occupation of Japan. Continuum International Publishing Group. Read More
Tags
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation Essay, n.d.)
Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1733161-why-did-japan-change-so-much-during-the-us-occupation
(Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation Essay)
Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation Essay. https://studentshare.org/history/1733161-why-did-japan-change-so-much-during-the-us-occupation.
“Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation Essay”. https://studentshare.org/history/1733161-why-did-japan-change-so-much-during-the-us-occupation.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Why Did Japan Change So Much During the US Occupation

East Asian Studies in China Culture

This was seen during the recent Olympics, when the protests that the Tibetans carried out were completely suppressed by the government.... The account that Philip Pan provides of the Southern Metropolis Daily gives us an insightful view of the future of the media in China.... They ensure the welfare of those sections that are ignored by the government that can do so precisely because of their existence.... Such a shift would require the use of technology that would enable a change from the government's standpoint....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Egalitarian as the Belief in Equity

In our current society, issue of equity has been of much concern.... In our current society, the issue of equity has been of much concern.... Individuals from a low social class have experienced much suffering in the hand of the haves.... They are treated as lesser being due to their social status; this is why they do not have much influence in major decision-making processes.... This essay tries to compare egalitarianism in japan and Korea basing on four books, these are Japanese workers in protest, Shinohata, class struggle and family struggle and finally ancestor worship and Korean society....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

Healthcare Utilization and Finance

For Zwick to qualify for this, she must have spent at least three days in the hospital during the two weeks prior to this Medicare, and she must be based at home.... Consolidated Omnibus Budget Reconciliation Act (COBRA) This is a crucial us government act enacted in 1985.... The infection causes a lot of pain during urination.... Health covers in other countries In countries such as Britain, japan, and Germany, there is a well-organized health strategy for all citizens....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Major Issues in Inflation

OPEC's decision to increase the price of oil contributed to the recession of the us economy in 1974 to 1975.... The classic example for this is the phenomena of the Mickey Mouse money in the Philippines during the Japanese occupation whereby the Japanese government issued Japanese peso in excess.... For the consumers, it makes their lives difficult because their money cannot buy much goods and services and in extreme cases, excessive inflation, such as the case of hyperinflation can drive consumers to hoard goods to shielf themselves from excessive increase of prices causing shortage of goods....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Nayar of India

The paper looks and explores the various aspects of Nayars as a caste, a culture, a community and a religion based in the southern part of India through the pages of pre-British and post-British period of ruling.... The first is their mode of subsistence, which is military… ally, but as the political scene changed in the subcontinent, they were forced to adopt other professions, in which they excelled very well, especially in the field of healthcare and now a days, they are globally acknowledged for their excellence in this field....
7 Pages (1750 words) Research Paper

Ethnic Minority Aspirations for Social Mobility

This was an area that came to develop rapidly during the period of the nineteenth century.... For example, those that are highly paid came from us, France, Germany, Japan, China, on the other hand, the less skilled are the large masses from Africa and Asia.... during these periods, there were different classes of people in the region.... during these periods, there has been great de-industrialization, which has shaped East End dramatically (Grusky, Ku and Szelényi 2008)....
6 Pages (1500 words) Literature review

The Significance of Sushi and Its Globalization

during the 19th century, people abandoned the fermentation process and began using vinegar.... As the years passed, so did the ancient process of making sushi.... "The Significance of Sushi and Its Globalization" paper identifies the traditional significance of sushi....
6 Pages (1500 words) Coursework

Fujiwara Clan and Governance

Under this period, the Fujiwara clan became so successful in governance.... Under this period, the Fujiwara clan became so successful Although the history of japan is often illustrated by institutional progress, it has had some significant turning points.... This vast history is divided into groups so as to make it more manageable.... As such, japan has had a long interesting history.... The Fujiwara family dominated japan between794 to 1160....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us