StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Antiglobalization Arguments - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The author of the following essay claims that with the passage of time the world is moving swiftly and making a lot of advancements every single day. These advancements have their own charm and attraction but meanwhile, they have some negative impact on society…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER94.9% of users find it useful
Antiglobalization Arguments
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Antiglobalization Arguments"

Anti-globalization arguments seriously undervalue the benefits that globalization has delivered for all countries” Introduction: With the passage of time the world is moving swiftly and making lot of advancements every single day. These advancements have their own charm and attraction but mean while they have some negative impact on the society (Block, & Cameron, 2002). The underlying paper has critically analyzed the positive impact of globalization along with its negative repercussion. Following that the paper has discussed the concept of anti globalization and its prevailing movement. It has highlighted what it is all about. The cause of emergence of the anti globalization has also presented in the paper and its increasing impact on the benefits of globalization. The concepts of globalization is supported by the long established concept of capitalization and on contrary to that the anti globalization movement is deeply against the existence and establishment of capitalization in the world irrespective of any of it’s from. Globalization and Anti Globalization At present, the escalating development and progress in international business, the trend of globalization at economical level is almost irreversible. This era is known as the era of global integration of economies which is growing quite swiftly. Where there are some benefits related with the advent of globalization, there are certain disadvantages which are prevailing in the world, redefining the social and cultural aspects of the world. Against which, there is a movement which support and advocates the concept of anti globalization (Petras, & Veltmeyer, 2001). The anti globalization is referred to as a disputed term which is related with the network of international social movement that has gained the attention of media after the protests against WTO (World Trade Organization) in Seatle. According to Britannica the term is neither completely reactive nor defensive. It is instead a proactive movement that advocates the global democracy and global justice. The main gist of anti globalization movement is to promote the democratic globalization or alternative globalization (Engler, 2007; Fuchs, n.d.). As the name suggests the movement opposed the globalization as well as the capitalism. The philosophy behind the anti globalization believes that the organizations and the individuals can attain the personal, social and economic objectives without creating adverse consequences for the society that are linked with capitalism (Tomlinson, 1999). The movement for anti globalization aim towards the efficiency of the economy and the decency of individuals being human in opposition to the prevailing corporate competition and fight for profits at any cost (Rugman, & Collinson, 2009). Michael Hardt and Toni Negri used another term to describe the anti globalization and that is “multitude” and according them it is used as a wide, unrestrained network that facilitates the livening and working in common (Hill, & Jain, 2007). This movement of anti globalization is decentralized and spontaneous in nature. It is self organized, networked, channeled and depends on the concept of grassroots democracy (Hill, & Jain, 2007). They believe that the capitalist globalization is the outcome of comprising the system of domination across the world. While examining the different aspect of globalization it is quite necessary to study and examine the theories of globalization and anti globalization. There have been three distinct theories of globalization that includes the world culture theory, the word system theory and the world polity theory. The world culture theory says that the globalization is related with the firmness of the world and the intensity of world consciousness(Robertson,1992). This concept makes the world ideally a single place. However, living in this place needs different individuals and society to define their position regarding their relation with the system and with different perspective of human kind. Hence the confrontation of individuals and the societies involves the comparative interaction of them (Robertson, 1992). Benefits of Globalization: According to Hamdi (2013) for many developing countries globalization have very positive impact in enhancing their economic growth, stability and solving their problems of poverty. With the advent of globalization the international management and the World Bank has encouraged and facilitated the developing countries to bring the market reforms and some fundamental changes with the help of loans. Hence, many developing countries have started taking steps, removed the tariffs and excess duties and have opened their market and freed their economies. This has facilitated the investment of developed countries in the developing countries which has created many job opportunities for the people. It has been observed that the developing countries depend for the flow of resources and technology on the developed countries on the other hand the developed countries are very much dependent for the raw material, oil, food and for their markets for industrial goods on several developing countries. In addition to that the culture of many developing countries has been also altered via globalization and many cultures have imitated the traits of each other. With globalization come diversity and that is resulted in the transformation of the cultures. Critical Discussion: With the passage of time the global consciousness and interdependence has overtaken the arrival of capitalist modernity (Mittelman, 1996). This aspect of the global situation has relativezed the existence and relevance of different individuals and national societies. Keeping all this in view, it has been figured out that near the end of twentieth century. The globalization has that much affected the world adversely that it has almost turned the world order into a big problem. According to the world system theory, the entire system of the world is a historical social system of different interdependent parts that build a structure and function in accordance to the distinct rules or it defined as a unit with multiple cultural systems and with single division of labor. Inworld polity theory polity refers to a system that creates value by the combined abdication of authority (Meyer, 2007). Here the system is comprised of certain set of rules that are known as models or frames. The actors or players in the system are referred to as the entities that are constructed and motivated by pervasive and persistent frames (Boli and Thomas, 1997). The developmental theory of globalization presents two different principle meanings. The first one depicts the term as a phenomenon that entails a greater interdependence of different regions and different countries of the world in the form of trade, finance and communications. The second principle depicts the globalization as a theory of economic development that includes significant assumptions which is based on enhanced level of integration between different regions across the globe and the significant impact of this integration on social indicators as well as the economic growth (Peng, 2009). With that the anti globalization emergence has created a feeling of reaching to euphoria. And this led to enjoy the political legitimacy and the movement of decentralization as a whole. It has been witnesses by all of us that anti globalization have emerged from anti capitalism and the phenomenon is aggravated from the left wing (McManus, White, & Botten, 2008). In addition to that as the spread of capitalism and worldwide markets, the liberal international economic order has described and has been challenged by many influential political philosophers to lessen the adverse impact of capitalism on the societies (Scholte, 2005). Further, with many positive impacts, the globalization has bring some adverse impact in terms of exporting the poverty among different nations, the negative repercussions of the economic liberalization due to the increase in globalization has worst affected the world (Bauman, 2000). The major impact resulted from the excessive facilitation of globalization include the international inequality. The comparisons between the rich and the poor have so much aggravated. According to World Bank inequality is defined as the income disparity and the disparity among the standard of living of different citizens as well as different nations (Birdsall, 2002). Further, being wealthy does not necessarily means being rich. It requires the stable government, infrastructure and the ability of the nations to accumulate wealth. Hence it is very important to establish a comparatively fair and equitable system for disturbing economies and empowerment of political powers to stabilize and strengthen the governments. Conclusion: Every rise has to face the downfall and it is truly said that too much of anything is bad. Without any doubt, globalization possess many benefits and it has brought many advantages for the world in several different ways, in term of making the world better place, in facilitating the flow of capital, goods and services all over the world as well as in bringing new opportunities for the ones who have some potential to tap new and emerging markets and avail the opportunities in the best possible way. However, there are some adversities attached with the advent of globalization. The movement has created the differences and disparities among the rich and poor, it has strengthened the strong and weaker the weak persons of the society, thus facilitating the exploitation of those who are in weaker position by the hands of those who hold the better position in the society. Further, globalization is based on the concept of capitalist. Hence, against to all such prevailing situations the anti globalization movements condemns the excessive prevalence of globalization and support the prevalence of global democracy and advocates the sharing of opportunities at equal level. References Bauman, Z. (2000). Globalization: The human consequences. Columbia University Press. Birdsall, N. (2002). Asymmetric globalization: Global markets require good global politics. Center for Global Development Working Paper, vol. 12. Block, D., & Cameron, D. (Eds.). (2002). Globalization and language teaching. Routledge. Boli, J., & Thomas, G. M. (1997). World culture in the world polity: A century of international non-governmental organization. American sociological review, pp. 171-190. Engler, M. (2007). Defining the Anti-Globalization Movement. Democracy uprising, Available from http://www.democracyuprising.com/2007/04/anti-globalization-movement/ [Accessed 25th February, 2015] Fuchs, C. (n.d.). Antiglobalization. Britannica, Available from http://global.britannica.com/EBchecked/topic/1903158/antiglobalization/308547/The-antiglobalization-movement [Accessed 25th February, 2015] Hamdi, F. M. (2013). The Impact of Globalization in the Developing Countries. Developing Country Studies, vol. 3, no. 11, pp. 142-144. Hill, C. W., & Jain, A. K. (2007). International business: Competing in the global marketplace. New York, NY: McGraw-Hill/Irwin. McManus, J., White, D., & Botten, N. (2008). Managing global business strategies: A twenty-first-century perspective. Oxford: Chandos Meyer, J. W. (2007). Globalization theory and trends. International Journal of Comparative Sociology, vol. 48, no. 4, pp. 261-273. Mittelman, J. H. (Ed.). (1996). Globalization: critical reflections (Vol. 9). Boulder, CO: Lynne Rienner. Peng, M. (2009). Global Strategy. Mason, OH: South-Western Cengage Learning Petras, J. F., & Veltmeyer, H. (2001). Globalization unmasked: Imperialism in the 21st century. Zed Books. Robertson, R. (1992). Globalization: Social theory and global culture (Vol. 16). Sage. Rugman, A. M., & Collinson, S. (2009). International business. Harlow: Prentice Hall. Scholte, J. A. (2005). Globalization: A critical introduction. Palgrave Macmillan. Tomlinson, J. (1999). Globalization and culture. University of Chicago Press. Verbeke, A. (2013). International business strategy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(Antiglobalization Arguments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 7, n.d.)
Antiglobalization Arguments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words - 7. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/social-science/1678450-critically-discuss-the-view-that-anti-globalisation-arguments-seriously-undervalue-the-benefits-that-globalisation-has-delivered-for-all-countries-02084
(Antiglobalization Arguments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 7)
Antiglobalization Arguments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 7. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1678450-critically-discuss-the-view-that-anti-globalisation-arguments-seriously-undervalue-the-benefits-that-globalisation-has-delivered-for-all-countries-02084.
“Antiglobalization Arguments Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words - 7”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/social-science/1678450-critically-discuss-the-view-that-anti-globalisation-arguments-seriously-undervalue-the-benefits-that-globalisation-has-delivered-for-all-countries-02084.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Antiglobalization Arguments

Globalization as understood and explained by corporations

To counter One another's assertions in regard to the merits and demerits of globalization, both the critics and the proponents have fronted several arguments in relation to the economic, political and social aspects of globalization.... This paper endeavors to compare and contrast globalization as understood and explained by corporations and other supporters on the political right with globalization as understood by anti-globalization opponents and critics on the political left....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

A Position Argument and Proposal Arguments

Position arguments do not necessarily point out a solution but tend to be controversy.... The goal of the position argument is to change the audience view about the issueProposal arguments identify a problem and offer a solution to the problem.... A proposal arguments goal is to affect the future....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Two Types Of Arguments

For instance, a person can take a position for or against the topic that democracy today is present only in name… The key feature of the argument system is to understand the topic and then give points with examples, definitions, and words from other credible sources as well as other thinkers, writers, scientists or notables who have considered the topic in depth. The Two Types of arguments Position Argument A position argument is a type of argument where a person speaks on a topic or makes a statement regarding a point which can be debated debate (Ramage & Bean, 1989)....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Annotated Bibliography and Structure

The source is extremely essential due to its rich information meant to support diverse arguments concerning anti globalization movements. This is an interview held in a BBC broadcasting studio Since, it has yielded to poverty in some states whereas the influential continue enriching themselves in the name of interdependence especially through trade.... This is a reliable source meant to support current global arguments regarding their perception towards globalization and its effects....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Antiglobalization as a Combination of Systems of Struggles

This resistance was popularly regarded as antiglobalization movement.... During this era, antiglobalization movement was viewed as an antiglobalization antiglobalization refers to opposition of policies and processes leading to globalization.... This resistance was popularly regarded as antiglobalization movement.... During this era, antiglobalization movement was viewed as an attempt to constitute to the start of a universal civil society which would probably lead to diverse political debates and multi-ethnic culture....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Deductive and Inductive Arguments

This argument is sound given the fact that all of its premises are logically correct hence it means Deductive and Inductive arguments A deductive argument is an argument in which the premises are correct, and thus the conclusion from that argument is bound to be correct (Iep.... The nature of the premises in inductive arguments determines whether the overall conclusion of the argument is weak or strong.... herefore, from the aforementioned definitions and illustrations it is evident that the deductive arguments are more compelling than the inductive arguments because their conclusion are correctly premised logically and morally as opposed to the inductive arguments, which are often incorrect and depend upon the perception or intention of the individuals to form a conclusion that can be either strong or weak....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Political theories and ideologies

An ideology or a theory is a story about our place in the world and the world we live in; political ideology relates greatly to the political philosophy and the political theories.... Ideology is a system comprised of beliefs and values that guide various processes and institutions… The society accepts these ideologies, as they are facts about a certain group of people....
4 Pages (1000 words) Essay

Is the United States Increasingly a Victim of the Globalisation It Once Championed

"Is the United States Increasingly a Victim of the Globalisation It Once Championed" paper states that the US sponsors globalization and works hard to maintain it because it is in consonance with its fundamental value and objective, which is capitalism and the free market system.... nbsp;… As this paper has emphasized it is considered by many as the best system ever and that it is still on the process of development, with its components, elements, and dimensions, constantly fine-tuned in order to achieve the best possible result in addressing economic problems such as poverty and other inequalities....
8 Pages (2000 words) Coursework
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us