StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Collective Bargaining - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The following essay "Collective Bargaining" concerns the right which employees of the company can use in order to form unions. As the author puts it, legal systems of the world do not prevent workers from forming unions and they do not encourage them to do so either. …
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER96.6% of users find it useful
Collective Bargaining
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Collective Bargaining"

Case Analysis with Reference to Collective Bargaining Introduction Collective bargaining is a right which employees of the company can use in order to form unions. The right is more ethical in nature than it is legal. However, legal systems of the world do not prevent workers from forming unions and they do not encourage them to do so either. At the end of the day, each organization has some kind of unions working in order to solve and resolve problems and disagreements with the management respectively. The lack of formal legislation in the field of unionization, the concept developed in the light of a few decisions which are taken by supreme courts of the countries. The unionization law therefore, differs in various economic systems. The unionization is not allowed directly but it is a method that is developed in order to exercise collective bargaining and in its objective forming unions is a legal act[Kat93]. The formation of union is only acceptable in private sector but it is treated as a capital crime in governmental offices and armed forces. In case of armed forces, the culprits of unionization are thrown into jail and upon completion of their sentence they are court-martialed. The formation of union is the last thing a soldier will think about before leaving his or her job. Additionally, armed forces argue that they are operating for saving their nations’ sovereignty and pride and therefore, they should not indulge in providing ideal work environment for the soldiers while they have to live in tough environment during the war so they must trained in terms of making the most of even the worst kind of work climate. The practices of collective bargaining and unionization are known to emerge at the end of great depression when people were forced to work under the extremities of inhumane environments. With the passage of time, the workers started to raise voices about their work environment and finally, legal courts initiated to respond to their needs and companies had to offer their employees a safe and sound environment to work in. the stream of change in this regard because the beacon of moment shifted towards improving the quality of supervisory behaviors as time passed. The legal pressures caused the companies to adopt modern philosophies of management such as delegation of authority and participative management. The Japanese taught the world that bureaucracy is an inefficient way of managing the organizations because it wastes too much time in decision making and they presented the concept of self managed teams which scanned the environment so that they can develop strategies in order to cope with the current challenges of the business. The employee became empowered with legal interventions in the corporate world. The Social-Legal-Economic-Political-Technological analysis of the society became a necessity for the businesses as they were interested in finding out as much as they can about the environment in which they have to operate. The communities where legal systems are weak, the businesses are less careful about their employees’ health and safety while, the societies where workers have been valued managed to create giants like Apple. Following are the detailed case analyses that had influenced collective bargaining and unionization as concepts in the modern world. Dunmore vs. Ontario (2001) The case between Dunmore and Ontario had been created when the employer tried to snatch the right of free association from its employers who were farmers by professions. The government of Canada which was ran by New Democratic Party of Ontario responded in due time by creation of Agricultural Relations Act. The act gifted the freedom of association and bargaining to local farmers of Ontario. However, the subsequent change in government shifted the power in the hands of Mike Harris’ Progressive Conservatives and they cancelled the Agricultural Relations Act. In response, Tom Dunmore, Salame Abdulhamid, Walter Lumsden and Michael Doyle who were supported by United Foods and Commercial Workers challenged the termination of the act. They also stood against Labour Relations and Employment Statute Amendment Act and argued that it stood against their right of free association. Both of these privileges were provided by the sections 2(d) and 15(1) of the charter itself. The issues in front of the court required that the judges must see whether or not Labour Relations and Employment Statute Amendment Act infringed both of the abovementioned sections of the charter and majority that section 2(d) was not followed as the employers tried to suppress the freedom of association of their employers at more than one occasion. The judge, Justice Bastarache articulated in the decision that the soul of section 2(d) is to facilitate performance by permitting free interpersonal communication and relations. However, the purpose of the piece of law was impaired by multitude of employers. The court found that effects of Labour Relations and Employment Statute Amendment Act resulted in infringement of section 2(d) and therefore, the newly formed act was cancelled and it reinstated the rights of farmers. Furthermore, the case linked section 2(d) with allowance of freedom to employees to have interpersonal relation with whomever they want to[Dun011]. In simple terms, the part of the charter was reinforced and it had been given a new meaning during the process which established that innocent human relations should not be prevented from forming into the organization which was a significant implication for the nature of the charter. Health Services and Support---Facilities Subcontractors Bargaining Assn vs. British Columbia (2007) The British Columbia’s healthcare systems were tempered with by passing a new law which was known as Health and Social Services Delivery Improvement Act. The act was established in order to make the company capable of coping with the challenges in terms of managing health related benefits of the staff. However, the act was made a formal part of the charter rapidly and due consultation from workers’ union was not obtained. The law granted the organization a much needed freehand regarding hiring contracted employees and the company was in position of providing minimal benefits to the temporary staff which was a clear violation of collective bargaining rights of the employees. The unions, medical professionals and social factions held on to the point that the law is against everything for which Charter’s provision supporting freedom of association stood for at that time. Trail and Appeal Judges collectively agreed that the act was not able to infringe section 2(d) of the charter. However, the appeal was allowed upon finding sections 6(2), 6(4) and 9 of the act as unaligned with the constitution. All of the mentioned sections allowed the company to treat the employees inhumanly. The decision was reached that considered section 2(d) of the Charter as a fundamental and the most enlightened employment law and the court held the viewpoint that the Charter’s basic purpose is to protect human rights of the employees as well and they are given the right to collective bargaining under section 2(d) whereas, they can use this right in order to achieve their common legal goals. They can also collectively bargain in order to have bettered working environment for themselves and they can work to change employment terms and conditions as well. In the light of above discussion, workers can be forced to work under inhumane environment and they preserve the right to challenge any changes in their employment contracts without prior notice as well. The goals and objectives of the employee regime are not protected by section 2(d) but the very process by that they should be pursued is protected by the constitutional right of collective bargaining[Hea07]. The demands of employees must be dealt with via holding discussions in a peaceful setting. The case again signified the linkages between freedom of association and collective bargaining. However, in this instance, the collective bargaining was being used to undo changes in employment contracts which were done without consulting with union and therefore, it was considered perfectly legal by the court of law to seek appropriate employment agreements for the employees. Ontario (Attorney General) vs. Fraser (2011) The case was established in response to the company’s policy change which left out the farmers of the area during negotiations with the management, the right granted by Labour Relations Act. The law was developed with the name of Agricultural Employees Protection Act. The company went on with its wrongdoing in order to create a separate system for farmers. However, the union reacted instantaneously towards such an open violence of section 2(d) of the Charter. The action of the company was considered both unethical and illegal by the stakeholders because it was done in the presence of court’s decision in the case of Health Services and Support---Facilities Subcontractors Bargaining Assn vs. British Columbia (2007). The decision reconfirmed the traditional and conventional stature of the law that states that employees should be allowed to form social relations in order to achieve their common interests and goals. However, the company committed a known violence of section 2(d) by leaving out farmers from negotiation process[Ont11] and therefore, the rights of farmers were reinstated on an immediate basis. Moreover, the decision revealed the shininess of section 2(d) in relation to the right of collective bargaining. Republic Service Employee Relations Act The Republic Service Employee Relations Act is known to provide basis of development for Canadian Charter of Rights and Freedoms. The Act mentioned the right of free association in the history of the country and after some time, the Charter of Rights and Freedoms was modified in order to include the new section about freedom of forging social relations which include right to strike as well[Ref87]. Alberta Human Rights Act The Alberta Human Rights Act was signed by Canadian government in the year of 1948. The Act added a flavor of antidiscrimination in the equation of social relations and extended the degree of liberty in this regard to suppressed factions of the population of Canada. Now no one can refuse to socialize with others on the basis of race, color and social status. The Charter is a collection of rules and regulations which are borrowed by several different sources and the featured act is one of them as well. The Charter is a sophisticated work in progress and its meanings are changing as the surrounding world modifies with the passage of time but this document will remain a guardian of human freedoms in times to come. Conclusion This paper has reviewed and analyzed the value and importance of associational rights of employees with the help of summarizing and evaluating court decisions on the subject matter. However, during the process, it was uncovered that Charter of Rights and Freedoms is not just a document but it has an embedded philosophy within it that argues that there should be no hate in humans whatsoever. These kinds of written materials are screaming to the world that it should embrace global citizenship behaviors more than anything in the present times. The times of nationalism is gone when that concept driven wars in the world. The essence of section 2(d) can be found in the need to see a stronger level of societal connection amongst the humans of the world. The hate is nothing more than or less than the absence of love and affection. The same conceptual framework has been used in order to promote homosexuality in the Canadian society because section 2(d) grants the right of association to everyone regardless of their gender until and unless it is consensual. The developed nations are developed due to their commitment in the direction of safeguarding their populations’ rights and eventually their life satisfactions increase manifold. In turn, they become more attached towards the notion of societal service. In the end, it can be inferred that the only difference which is present in advanced and less developed worlds stems out of their quality of life. Empowered legal systems can alone bring betterment in societies in ways one even cannot begin to calculate. References Kat93: , (Katz, 1993), Dun011: , (Dunmore v. Ontario (Attorney General), 2001), Hea07: , (Health Services and Support - Facilities Subsector Bargaining Assn. v. British Columbia, 2007), Ont11: , (Ontario (Attorney General) v. Fraser, 2011), Ref87: , (Reference Re Public Service Employee Relations Act (Alta.), 1987), Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Collective Bargaining Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 words”, n.d.)
Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/professional/1648389-referring-to-four-of-the-supreme-court-of-canada-cases-you-read-what-human-rights-claims-about-unionization-and-collective-bargaining-rights-have-workers-advanced-under-the-charter-to-what-degree-have-these-claims-been-successful-include-explicit-discu
(Collective Bargaining Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words)
https://studentshare.org/professional/1648389-referring-to-four-of-the-supreme-court-of-canada-cases-you-read-what-human-rights-claims-about-unionization-and-collective-bargaining-rights-have-workers-advanced-under-the-charter-to-what-degree-have-these-claims-been-successful-include-explicit-discu.
“Collective Bargaining Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 2000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/professional/1648389-referring-to-four-of-the-supreme-court-of-canada-cases-you-read-what-human-rights-claims-about-unionization-and-collective-bargaining-rights-have-workers-advanced-under-the-charter-to-what-degree-have-these-claims-been-successful-include-explicit-discu.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Collective Bargaining

Collective Bargaining Dispute

Collective Bargaining “consists of negotiations between an employer and a group of employees so as to determine the conditions of employment”(Cornell University Law School, n.... hellip; Aside from determining the conditions of employment, another purpose of a Collective Bargaining agreement is to have definite rules that will govern the relationship between the employer and employee(International Labour Organization, 2007). The Collective Bargaining dispute Collective Bargaining Dispute Collective Bargaining Dispute Collective Bargaining “consists of negotiations between an employer and a group of employees so as to determine the conditions of employment”(Cornell University Law School, n....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Collective Bargaining Behavior - Two bargaining Approaches

Collective Bargaining Behavior- Two bargaining Approaches There are two types of bargaining.... There are two types of bargaining.... The first type is referred to as traditional bargaining.... The second type is known as interest-based bargaining.... In the traditional bargaining type, every party in the negotiation is determined to either maximize their gained and or minimize their losses.... hellip; In this bargaining type, there is usually much confrontation as each and every party struggles hard to optimize his gains....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay

Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining

Workers find it necessary to come into groups so as to enhance their bargaining power (French, 2013).... This age has widely been referred to as the information age, but there is enough evidence to suggest that it could also, rightly, be referred to as the age of entitlement.... This is especially the case with regard to employees....
5 Pages (1250 words) Research Paper

Development of Collective Bargaining in the United States

The negotiations in relation to Collective Bargaining are likely to take place in relation to the working regulations that the employers and the employees need to follow… However, in this context the main stress will be laid upon the scenario observed in the United States with regard to the Collective Bargaining policies.... The main objective would be to analyze the previous and the current trends of Collective Bargaining policies that the Development of Collective Bargaining in the United s Introduction The topic of the discussion will comprise the development of Collective Bargaining in the United States....
2 Pages (500 words) Research Paper

Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining

They include basic questions (Holley, Labor Relations and Collective Bargaining Affiliation: Workforce diversity This is having employees of different ages, culture and sex among other differences.... It is important for global business and interaction.... This is a legal requirement even though it is used to indicate racial and gender differences only in practice (Holley, Jennings and Wolters,… These are interviews that have written down questions with minimal responses....
1 Pages (250 words) Coursework

Issues for Police Collective Bargaining Union Formations

However, the advancement in the formation of the unions was halted by the formulation of laws that stopped the process of organization formation. In 1935, the Issues for Police Collective Bargaining Union Formations Affiliation Issues for Police Collective Bargaining Union Formations The process of unionization began back in the year 1919 by the police and other public employees.... The law enforcement field started to form bargaining power units in the year 1960s and the 1970s....
1 Pages (250 words) Admission/Application Essay

Collective Bargaining and Pay Inequity in the Public Sector

A lot of improvement has been noted Collective Bargaining agreements and Pay Inequality in the Public Sector.... The National Labor Relations Act-1935 for instance permitted Collective Bargaining in the private sector and excluded the public sector.... This is because Collective Bargaining is a very important way through which employees can push for their rights considering the historical discrimination that has been witnessed in America's public sector....
2 Pages (500 words) Essay

Collective Bargaining Process

This essay "Collective Bargaining Process" sheds some light on Collective Bargaining as a process where workers of a certain organization meet together and converse with their employers on various issues concerning their employment.... hellip; In many countries, Collective Bargaining is the process by which unions and the employees' representatives meet and bargain a new contract concerning labor.... Although in many countries Collective Bargaining has a deeper legal implication, in a general sense it is the coming together of the employees to negotiate the terms of their employment with the employer....
1 Pages (250 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us