StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

The Fifth Replies of Descartes - Essay Example

Cite this document
Summary
The argument in question is the argument of Discourse. The problem with this counter argument is the inherent bias. There is a premise and there's a conclusion if one accepts the premise the conclusion must be accepted.

Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER91.1% of users find it useful
The Fifth Replies of Descartes
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "The Fifth Replies of Descartes"

Essay-Philosophy In the Fifth Replies, Descartes writes, “I am surprised that you should say here ... that I distinctly know that I exist, but not that I know what I am or what my nature is” (71–2). Descartes seems to be insisting, contrary to his objectors, that the cogito conclusion, “I exist,” is inseparable from an understanding of the nature of self or mind as a thinking substance. Explain Descartes’ arguments in moving from the initial realization of the cogito conclusion to his claims about thinking substance, and then explain how good these arguments are in light of the criticism in the Objections or your own criticisms. The argument in question is the argument of Discourse. The problem with this counter argument is the inherent bias. There is a premise and theres a conclusion if one accepts the premise the conclusion must be accepted. Renée Descartes says that he knows he exists it is inherent that he knows what he is and what his nature is, it is the very definition of establishing his existence. This knowledge (of existing) cannot be separated from the knowledge of what that existence is about. This point can be elaborated through an example for instance one sees a bottle of water. His eyes tell him that it is there. Since this person has the premise that what his eyes see is in fact real (or existing) it means that he knows that the bottle exists. When he say that it exists it means it has certain properties that indicate that it exists. No one can say that something exists without acknowledging the properties. Existence without the knowledge of its properties is even more illogical than deriving a conclusion that existence of self also encompasses the nature of self. When René Descartes say that he thinks therefore he exists, it means that he is aware of what he is and what his nature is. Otherwise there is no existence. Every existence has its properties; be it divine authority like God or as trivial as a plastic water bottle. The objection of Descartes’s claim rests with the understanding of premise. If the critics accept the premise when Renée says that something exists, he also bases this by understanding some properties. The philosopher has some understanding of the nature and properties of the object. This existence theory can also be related to the existence of God. For instance René has confirmed many times that he doesnt understand God. But he knows that he exists, it means he is aware of certain godlike properties. No one has to have full understanding of something to know that it exists. No one has to know the chemical composition of plastic or water to know what the properties of water and plastic are. The whole debate can be summed up in one sentence that size beats all. No one can fully comprehend everything. If someone said that they have clear and distinct knowledge about something then what is the proof that they know everything about something? This is the question that can be posed back to the objectors. Be it Renée Plato Aristotle or Kant, every philosopher or any individual has to have some understanding of any existence to be able to function properly. They do acknowledge some parts of their lives in order to establish the others. It is not a matter of absolute proof that existence describes the nature it is a matter of having sufficient proof to establish what is unknown. “…it enables the mind to distinguish without difficulty what belongs to itself that is to an intellectual nature” (Descartes 9) The point of difference between the two arguments is that the clear and distinct knowledge which fully comprehends something exists or not. If they both (both school of thought) agreed that they cannot fully comprehend something then they have to confirm to certain gray areas which incorporate both sides of the argument. Through some knowledge about the properties of something it can be established that it exists and therefore through the existence that a person exists there is also an acknowledgment of its properties and nature. Everyone agrees that human mind, its comprehension and understanding, all have limitations. Size beats all in the end. Whether its too big like the infinity of the universe or too small like quarks in an atom. Let alone the concept of self or of God. “…for it is in the nature of the infinite not to be grasped by a finite being like myself” (Descartes 32) Renée writes in his book that “many irreligious people are unwilling to believe that God exists and that the human mind is distinct from the body is that a legend fact that that no one hitherto has been able to demonstrate these points. Now, I completely disagree with this …” (Descartes 4) Renées example of a triangle also helps in explaining this phenomenon. If a triangle is imagined in the head, it also raises many questions as to why the person is thinking about the triangle. If everything in a persons control or there are things that are sent by the divine or simply the fate. The objections from the critics as to how a person can explain the nature and the properties by merely acknowledging the existence of something can also be countered with the argument that everything cannot be established absolutely through demonstration or experience. The mind is a reflective organ it questions everything, it reacts to everything, and not everything is supposed to be experienced to acknowledge its existence, nature or properties. The example of a triangle is just the tip of the iceberg. Renée says that through imagining the triangle he can explain other shapes that can be created out of the triangle. At least it gives some insight into other shapes. Does that mean that René has seen or experienced every other shape or simply he had sufficient information to establish other disciplines of shapes? The answer is definitely the latter; there is sufficient information to establish the truth just as the sufficient information on existence can be used to establish the nature and the properties of that existence. The whole argument can be summed up in a few words that any rational person needs some amount of information or data to establish the rest of the truth. Researchers do not ask each and every person or examine each item in a sample of thousands to see what the rest of the set will behave like. This is why it is called sample testing. It is similar to the case in question that René absolutely knows that he exists therefore he also understands what he is and what his nature is. Reference Descartes, René. Meditations on First Philosophy. Ed. John Cottingham. Cambridge: Cambridge UP, 1986. Print. Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“The Fifth Replies of Descartes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words”, n.d.)
The Fifth Replies of Descartes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1631612-the-fifth-replies-of-descartes
(The Fifth Replies of Descartes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words)
The Fifth Replies of Descartes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1631612-the-fifth-replies-of-descartes.
“The Fifth Replies of Descartes Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1000 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/philosophy/1631612-the-fifth-replies-of-descartes.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF The Fifth Replies of Descartes

Descartes vs Spinoza Comparison

Your Name Your Lecturer's Name Your Course Date Comparison of the Philosophies of descartes & Spinoza Descartes and Spinoza are two of the earliest philosophers who propounded theories at the end of the Medieval Ages.... It compares the two schools of philosophical thought of descartes and Spinoza and how it relates to the content of items and objects.... descartes states that the human being is made up of a body and a soul that are two distinct parts and relate to God and the world in different ways (2)....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Knowledge is Power (Journal Entry)

descartes, Meditations on First Philosophy, Meditations I and II On meditations descartes tries to look down upon his believes by putting forth the fact that he recall that his thinking have cheated him before.... descartes' intention, as at the beginning of the meditation, is to evade judgment about any of his beliefs which throws the whole thing into doubt.... descartes also decided to be reminding himself every other time not to be accepting beliefs without concrete evidence to proof them, a habit to which he is doubtful....
3 Pages (750 words) Essay

Argumentative on the Existence of God

Philosophers such as John Locke, Nyaya, Plato, Zhuangzi, descartes, Nagarjuna, Ganges, Thomas Reid, Edmund Burke, and Sextets Empiricus have postulated various theories about God.... This essay describes the existence of God has remained the most controversial and the most popular issue....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

The Cartesian Method

This paper ''descartes'' tells that Rene descartes was a different philosopher in his rights.... TheCarThe tesian theory reaches its point of elasticity when Rene descartes approaches the argument of the existence of God.... It is thus rational to argue that the Cartesian method does not fully satisfy the philosophical requirements since the existence of God according to this method, though based on rational judgment according to the creator of the theory, leaves many a question unanswered as to thaw God came to being, something that even Rene descartes himself cannot explain satisfactorily....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

The Relationship between Human Beings and the Natural World

Philosophers who have worked on these issues are Kant, Montaigne, descartes, and Pascal etc.... Page 1999) While supporters of Aristotle held the view that exacting natural bodies are parading substances, descartes holds the view point that there are no substances at all, and therefore it is no shocker that they do not take bliss in the virtue which he posits as a belonging of all true substance....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Philosophical Thoughts

The present essay "Philosophical Thoughts" aims to examine the fact, in the light of theoretical frameworks presented by Rene descartes and A.... The present paper aims to examine the fact, in the light of theoretical frameworks presented by Rene descartes and A....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay

The Disagreement on Human nature among the Greatest Philosophers

The paper has briefly looked into different philosophies Plato, Aristotle, descartes, and Kant in order to understand which theory has more weight.... Plato, Aristotle, descartes, Kant etc.... Plato, Aristotle, descartes, Kant etc.... Kant considers human nature as a composition of feelings, one relations and cognitions, and these aspects are governed by a priory prescribed by a “higher cognitive power” (Frierson 13)descartes is also in agreement with Kant that there is a divine authority....
2 Pages (500 words) Article

The Motivations behind the Birth of Modern Philosophy

In the paper “The Motivations behind the Birth of Modern Philosophy” the author discusses the great motivator of the modern philosophy, which is dependant on the educational foundation that the Greek and Latin schools laid.... The early thinkers had taken advantage of the motivators.... hellip; The author states that the current world does not in any way portray a clear picture of the way it was some few years ago....
6 Pages (1500 words) Assignment
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us