StudentShare
Contact Us
Sign In / Sign Up for FREE
Search
Go to advanced search...
Free

Banking Regulatory Reforms - Report Example

Cite this document
Summary
This report "Banking Regulatory Reforms" discusses the banking industry from the future shocks for the benefit of all stakeholders. The report analyses introducing the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) by 2015 and the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) by 2018…
Download full paper File format: .doc, available for editing
GRAB THE BEST PAPER97.1% of users find it useful
Banking Regulatory Reforms
Read Text Preview

Extract of sample "Banking Regulatory Reforms"

?Banking and Insurance Law Spring Dr Ifzal Akhtar Section XXX IDs: Majors: Assignment Basel III (30 Banking Regulatory Reforms Introduction The origination of Basel accord can be traced back to the exchange rate crisis occurred in 1974 due to breakdown of the Bretton Woods system. The Federal Banking Supervisory Office of West Germany cancelled the banking license of Bankhaus Herstatt when they discovered that the bank had foreign exchange exposures that were three times to its capital. Due to this act of the central bank, many banks had to suffer huge losses on their pending trades with Herstatt triggering a cascading effect in the banking sector. A few months later, the Franklin National Bank of New York had to shut their operations due to substantial foreign exchange losses. The turmoil in the financial sector prompted the governors of the central banks of G10 countries to decide upon measures on Banking Regulations and Supervisory Practices. Later, this came to be known as the Basel Committee on Banking Supervision with a purpose to extend cooperation among its member countries in the matters related to banking supervision. Initial objectives were to set minimum supervisory standards; exchange information on supervisory practices and improve the techniques of supervision on their banking system. The Central banks of the each member country represent their countries in the committee. It must be noted that the committee's decision has no legal bearing. The committee formulates standards and recommends them to their member countries for its implementation. The committee's sole aim is to have common standards for regulatory and adequacy measures. The 1988 accord among the member countries, with regard to the regulation and supervision of banking sector, continued until 1999 when the Committee decided to further improve the capital adequacy framework. Current Regime under Basel II The revised capital framework came into force in 2004 called Basel II. The Basel II was aimed at creating an international standard for regulators to decide upon how much capital the banks must have to safeguard themselves in the event of any financial crisis. Sufficient consistency of regulations was focused at to ensure that this does not become a reason of competitive inequality for some of them. Their advocates believed that such a regulatory framework is needed to prevent failure of banking system should such crisis emerge in the future (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2013). Basel II, in theory at least, attempted to set up capital and risk management requirements so that banking failures could be avoided. For this, Basel II created disclosure requirements so that all market participants could know about the capital adequacy of a financial institution. They also ensured that market risk, credit risk, and operational risk are articulated based on available data. Basel II focused on minimum capital requirements, market discipline and adequate supervision (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2013). Though Basel II regulatory measures were in force yet it could not prevent 2008 international financial crisis. Post 2008 crisis, the Central banks came out pointing various reasons of financial failures and about the weaknesses that existed in Basel II accord. An urgent need was felt by all concerned to address weaknesses in Basel II. That is why the Basal committee on banking supervision decided to create a new comprehensive accord that could further reform and address the issues that were instrumental in causing the 2008 financial crisis (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2013). It will be interesting to see how Islamic banks, in the context of Basel II manage the capital adequacy and risk exposures. Islamic banks do not use money markets and that is why they are susceptible to liquidity risks. Their inability to borrow for short-term fund needs make them vulnerable to market fallouts. The situation necessitates that Islamic banks must maintain higher liquidity than any conventional banks. Basel II also expects from Islamic banks to meet regulatory and legal measures as applicable to others; however, the following could be prominent issues in Islamic banking (Hassan & Dicle, 2009). Deposit Insurance In convention banking system, most of the regulatory framework aims at creating deposit insurance schemes to protect interest of deposit holders. Islamic banking system does not have such insurance protection schemes and therefore deposit holders are exposed to risk. Current Accounts Current account holders create deposits with the Islamic banks for the safety of their funds. Islamic banks make investment of this fund and they do this without the consent of current account holders to make profits; however, profits are not distributed to the account holders. Deposit holders get their share of profit, only if the funds are invested along with other deposit pools. In view of the risk involved on the part of the deposit holders, it becomes important that regulatory authority makes it mandatory to seek insurance for current accounts. Profit and Loss Sharing Accounts Islamic banks' earnings come from their share of returns. It is up to them how they share the returns with the deposit holders for the share of funds provided by them; however, regulatory issues are involved here when rights of certain deposit holders are violated. Regulatory authority needs to impose a mechanism to regulate profit sharing that is acceptable to deposit holders. Islamic banks tend to match deposits with credits; however, they carry maturity related liquidity risks with regard to profit and loss accounts and regulatory authorities must find ways to regulate such risks. BASEL III The financial crisis of 2008 created a need to develop more stringent measures to control and regulate banking activities. The Basal Committee of Banking Supervision (BCBS) revised the capital adequacy measures and the framework came to be known as Basel III. Basel III norms were endorsed by G20 countries when they met in 2010 Summit in Seoul, Korea. The key recommendations of the Basel III can be summarized as per the following (Basel Committee on Banking Supervision, 2013). Basel III initiates three major reforms that are aimed at improving banking sector's ability to face financial shocks that may arise due to financial crisis; improving banks disclosures and transparency; and enhancing governance with respect to risk management. Basel III enforces on banks to maintain 4.5% of common equity against current norms of 2% in Basel II. Tier 1 capital requirements have been revised upwards to 6% of risk-weighted assets from the existing 4% in Basel II. Additional capital buffers need to be maintained in Basal III during high credit growth. Liquidity Coverage Ratio (LCR) and Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) are two important standards that have become a part of the Basel III. As per the LCR, banks will need to keep high-quality liquid assets in sufficient amount to ward off a 30-day stressed funding scenario. The NSFR, a long-term structural ratio, is aimed at meeting liquidity crisis. It will take into account the entire balance sheet providing incentives to banks to harness more stable sources of funding. Implementation of Basel III reforms has been earmarked such that it does not hamper the economic recovery adversely; accordingly, implementation has been phased out in 5 years. For example, the Tier 1 requirements and the minimum common equity norms revised from 4% and 2% levels respectively to 4.5% and 3.5% will be implemented by early 2013. They will be further boosted to 5.5% and 4% in the beginning of 2014 respectively; the last phase will finish in beginning of 2015 when Tier 1 capital and common equity will be raised to 6% and 4.5% respectively. Capital conservation buffer of 2.5%, in addition to the 4.5% minimum requirement, will come into effect from January 1, 2016 and will become fully effective only by January 1, 2019. Similarly, the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) will get effective from January 1 2015 at 60% rate to become fully effective only on January 1, 2019 with equal annual increments of 10 percent. NCFR denoting minimum liquidity standard, as introduced in Basel III, will begin phasing in January 1, 2018 to address funding mismatches. Kafsa Kara argues that Islamic banks are adequately capitalized and many of them already exceed norms set by the Basel III. Islamic banks were least involved during last financial crisis. In fact, they fared reasonably well after the crisis; nevertheless, they aim at improving further. Islamic bank's structure is not only simpler but also more tangible to understand. As per Islamic Financial Service Board (IFSB), they have already initiated the regulations as per Basel III such as capital adequacy and the forms of additional capital needed. Islamic banking due to their high levels of Tier 1 capital, they are less impacted than many high-leveraged conventional banks (Kara, 2011). Conclusion Basel III is an extension to the Basel II imposing more stringent parameters on banking industry post 2008 financial crisis. It is need of an hour to safe guard the banking industry from the future shocks in the benefit of all stakeholders and Basel III is a right step in that direction. Basel III will certainly provide required cushioning to the industry and international economy by imposing norms on capital adequacy norms related to Tier 1 capital and common equity. The LCR and NSFR will provide more strength to banking industry and will help avoid any future financial crisis. Furthermore, Basel III provides enough time to banks to meet with the regulatory norms such as minimum capital requirements by 2015; conservation buffer by 2019; disclosing the leverage ratio by 2018; introducing the liquidity coverage ratio (LCR) by 2015 and the Net Stable Funding Ratio (NSFR) by 2018. Works-Cited Basel Committee on Banking Supervision (2013). “A Brief History of the Basel Committee”. Web. 30 Oct. 2013 Hassan, Kabir; Dicle, Mehmet. Basel II and Regulatory Framework for Islamic Banks. Web. 30 Oct. 2013 Kara, Hafsa. Islamic banks hold Basel III advantage. The Banker. Web. 2011. 31 Oct. 2013 Read More
Cite this document
  • APA
  • MLA
  • CHICAGO
(“Banking Regulatory reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words”, n.d.)
Banking Regulatory reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 words. Retrieved from https://studentshare.org/law/1489755-banking-regulatory-reforms
(Banking Regulatory Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words)
Banking Regulatory Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words. https://studentshare.org/law/1489755-banking-regulatory-reforms.
“Banking Regulatory Reforms Essay Example | Topics and Well Written Essays - 1500 Words”, n.d. https://studentshare.org/law/1489755-banking-regulatory-reforms.
  • Cited: 0 times

CHECK THESE SAMPLES OF Banking Regulatory Reforms

Banking regulation and risk

The legacy of the 2008 financial crisis is undeniable, the current global financial system - its risk-based regulatory framework lacks a kind of efficiency and authority to check each and every element of the financial crisis as we watch them happen helplessly.... This should already prompt us to questions existing frameworks and conventions such as the Basel II and the existing risk-based regulatory framework that govern the world financial systems.... hellip; banking Regulation and Risk....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

President Obama and the Financial Reform

  This paper attempts to present the need for financial reforms, the analysis of the new reforms.... It discusses and analyzes the implications of financial reforms and how US President Obama and his administration going to implement the legislative reforms.... But this crisis brought forward the weaknesses in the US financial system and called for major financial reforms so as to end the severe recession....
9 Pages (2250 words) Research Paper

Role of State and Central Banks in Financial Crisis

With this at the backdrop the paper intends to give a detailed description on the role of central banks and state during financial crisis and how reforms undertaken have brought about a change in the situations post crisis.... Governmental policies play an active part in setting up an effective regulatory framework that control all segments of financial services2.... These are supposed to be the price paid for central banks' improper actions and banking sector's engagement in speculative activities....
19 Pages (4750 words) Essay

Financial Services Regulation in the UK

Because of the high profit margins and the resultant stiff competition, the financial services sector has been marred with a lot of confusions and complex regulatory and operational issues.... These regulatory agencies and laws not only provide free and independent complaint services to the public and financial firms but also amicably solve grievances among financial institutions and their consumers (Francis, 2001).... banking and Finance Law By [Name of Student] [Name of Institution] [Date] Introduction Financial services refer to all the products (goods and services) that financial institutions offer to the public (White, 1991)....
9 Pages (2250 words) Essay

Perspectives of Regulation of Complex Financial Institutes

Module 7 ASSIGNMENT: There are various regulatory issues on which both public and private organizations deal closely with each other.... General complaints about a “lack of regulatory aggressiveness” ignore the realities of actually bringing enforcement actions in a tough environment.... regulatory enforcement in the United States operates surprisingly well given the difficulties of this operating environment, and critics have not presented credible alternatives to the present system....
5 Pages (1250 words) Essay

Reactions to the Financial Crisis Including the Changes to the EU Regulatory Process

… EVALUATE THE MAIN EU regulatory REACTIONS TO THE FINANCIAL CRISIS INCLUDING THE CHANGES TO THE EU regulatory PROCESS FOR FINANCIAL SERVICES (Author's name) (Institutional Affiliation) Introduction The financial crisis that rocked the European Union from 2007-2009 affected the economies largely because the mega financial institutions within Europe were operating in a similar business model to that of the United States prior to the crisis.... The European regulatory response to the crisis was significantly slower to that of the United States....
6 Pages (1500 words) Essay

Regulatory Reforms in the US

The author of this essay "regulatory reforms in the US " describes key aspects of the economy in the US.... n the US, the origin of the 2008 subprime market crisis, reforms being sought are incorporated in the Dodd(?... This paper outlines a structural change in financial markets, the lack of regulation of the banking sector that led to the financial crisis, the new regulatory structures.... Coupled with this is the “shift towards more self-regulatory rules that permitted US investment banks to increase leverage and reduce diversification under the pressure of competition” (Coffee, 2009, p....
8 Pages (2000 words) Essay

The main EU regulatory to the financial crisis

This essay "The main EU regulatory to the financial crisis" considers the financial crisis of 2007-2009, the subsequent sections address the financial regulatory responses carried out by the European Union as well as changes to the EU regulatory process for financial services.... In this regard, such instruments played a part in exploiting weaknesses evident in financial regulatory structures.... In addition, under-written mortgages and securities, insufficient coordination within national regulatory bodies, and regulatory arbitrage by the regulators all played a role in undermining the regulatory structures....
7 Pages (1750 words) Essay
sponsored ads
We use cookies to create the best experience for you. Keep on browsing if you are OK with that, or find out how to manage cookies.
Contact Us